Love In Zora Neale Hurstons Novel - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 581 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/05/29 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Their Eyes Were Watching God Essay Did you like this example? In Their Eyes Were Watching God, there were many themes represented. One of the major themes in this story was love. This topic affects the characters in many different ways. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Love In Zora Neale Hurstons Novel" essay for you Create order The author, Zora Neale Hurston, begins this book with the readers being captivated by a glimpse of the present before she jumps into a flashback of the main character’s journey. When the readers read each chapter, they meet different characters who will become important later on in the book. We see the strong emotions in these characters come to life in detail by the author. The main character of the novel, Janie, goes through a life journey of learning to know who she is and how to face difficult situations headon. It begins the story from an emotional standpoint. Love can be found very easily by people, but for Janie it was more of a challenge She didn’t end up finding true love until after she had been married twice. Because of that Janie didn’t end up finding true love until she was older. Nanny taught her to protect herself from love so it was much harder for Janie to actually find her true love. Janie does everything that she can to find the love that she actually deserves, with that being said she goes through a few guys just to find it. Having three relationships helped Janie understand life and also helped her learn from those relationships. Janie ended up marrying a man named Logan Killicks because her Nanny had set them up. She hoped that marrying Logan would end her loneliness and that she would love him no matter what. The longer that Janie was married to Logan, the more she couldn’t find anything to love about him. Janie figured out that Logan only wanted her to help him by working on his farm. Basically, Logan treated Janie like his slave and got mad at her if she didn’t work with him. From this relationship, Janie learned that marriage didn’t make love. â€Å"The familiar people and things had failed her so she hung over the gate and looked up the road towards way off. She knew now that marriage did not make love. Janie’s first dream was dead, so she became a woman† (Hurston 25). Janie gets irritated with Logan and decides that it’s time for her to run off. She ends up meeting a man named Joe Starks. Janie was thinking that maybe for once she had actually found true love, something that everyone deserves. Joe and Janie come across a small town named Eatonville. He asks if he can speak to the mayor, but turns out the town does not have one. Joe ends up becoming the mayor of the town. Janie realizes that Joe is just like Logan Killicks, but just in a different way. She realizes that Joe is quite controlling and never wants her to go hangout with her friends and have fun. When things between Janie and Joe start getting worse Janie finally tells Joe that he has been treating her poorly. In this horrendous relationship between them, Janie learns how to finally be herself around others. As Janie is reaching her third relationship, she realizes that Tea Cake is the man of her dreams. When she is with Tea Cake, she has the freedom that she has always wanted. Dating Tea Cake makes it so much easier for Janie to make and have new friends.

A Declaration Of Color Blindness - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 780 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/04/02 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Black Lives Matter Essay Did you like this example? Trayvon Martin was fatally shot by a white police officer on February 26, 2012. The very same officer was acquitted on July 13, 2013 after claiming it was self defense to an all female jury. Following this acquisition, three black organizers created the movement known today as Black Lives Matter, all by creating the new hashtag #blacklivesmatter. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Declaration Of Color Blindness" essay for you Create order Though they officially coined the term, there is no official leader, no rulesheet, just a call to value black lives for what they are human beings. In a world where Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise, it is an affirmation of Black folks humanity, our contributions to this society, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression(Khan-Cullors). Yet arguments continue to go around, with another popular hashtag eventually reaching trending called #alllivesmatter. They criticize the black lives matter movement, saying we are all brothers and sisters, that the saying is too narrow. Arent they right? In the end, shouldnt every person be valued the same as the other? Or maybe something else has gone into the slogan of Black Lives Matter, and not them putting their own on a pedestal. The idea that racism no longer exists in America shouldnt even be a thought racing in someones mind, yet people continually believe we could end racism when Jim Crow laws ended. But did we really? If we did, then why, when we hear about someone gets murdered by a police officer, see a black person more often than someone white? People of color represent thirty eight point five percent of the population, but fifty one point five percent of all lives lost in the years 2015-2016(Fox, 2018). Police violence is disproportionately affecting black people, along with Hispanics and people with native American backgrounds. Yet, we have seemingly ended racism so, its just a coincidence, right? We, after all, did elect a black man to become president, so this is obviously a post-racial America. A post racial America where all lives should matter instead of just the ones being disproportionately shot and killed by police officers. Bill Maher expressed that All Lives Matter implies that lives are equally at risk, and theyre not. By saying All Lives Matter, it is an attempt to diminish the ongoing reality of the fact that white supremacy still exists. By saying All Lives Matter, they are silencing those trying to make a difference and take down the unjust that holds racial equality at bay. The All Lives Matter movement is a declaration of color blindness, a declaration of everyone is equal so everyones lives should matter. In a way, they are right. American football player Richard Sherman said I stand by what I said that All Lives Matter and that we are all human beings. In 2017, police shot and killed just short of 1,000 people, tallying in nine hundred eighty-seven people dead at the hands of the officers. White males continued to account for the largest group of people killed while armed with guns or knives, at 330 of those killed. Black males armed with guns or knives were fatally shot in 160 cases last year(Sullivan, Anthony, Tate, Jenkins, 2018.) Seeing as more white men were killed by police, shouldnt all lives matter? Shouldnt everyone be fighting for all lives to be stopped by police brutality. When asked which statement is closest to their own views, 78% of Likely U.S. Voters say all lives matter(Rasmussen 2015) All Lives Matters claims they are not doing an ything wrong, they are just fighting for us all, believing that everyone are brothers and sisters and should be treated equally, no race above another one. For more than four centuries, black people have experienced more hardships than one can imagine, from slavery to civil rights to the continued prejudice against them today. They are standing up for themselves with Black Lives Matter. All Lives Matter is racist. Black Lives matter was never intended to imply that on black lives do matter. None of that is hate for white living. It is about realizing that white people already have privilege and do not need to constantly worried if there is a target on their back. It is about recognizing that while our lives do matter, there are other lives right now, that matter more. There are other lives that have been full of hardship, that need help from others with privilege. By saying All Lives Matter, you are erasing that cry for help. By saying All Lives Matter,you are pretending nothings wrong. Black Lives Matter is saying that they recognize that white lives already do matter. It is a statement of their lives also matter ing. It is saying blac k lives matter, too.

Rose’s Characterization of McCarthyism Free Essays

Rose has used the actions and motives of the jurors as a method of characterising and thus criticising the practise of McCarthyism. A fine example of this is the 3rd juror. A reckless and unrestrained man, he makes accusations against fellow jurors for not siding with his point of view; ‘Listen, you voted â€Å"guilty†, didn’t you? What side are you on? ’ – a direct reflection of the actions adopted by senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950’s. We will write a custom essay sample on Rose’s Characterization of McCarthyism or any similar topic only for you Order Now The 3rd juror also wrongly accuses the 5th for changing his vote to ‘not-guilty’ without any evidence to support his conclusion. This further exemplifies the premise of ‘making unfair allegations or using unfair investigative techniques, especially to restrict dissent’. He also verbally attacks those jurors that he perceives as beneath him to further assert his own power or control as well as to discourage any views that are contrary to his own. The 10th juror is also used to reflect another aspect of McCarthyism. He seems almost afraid of those different to him and his speech regarding those born in slums is an example of the paranoia that the practise of McCarthyism can spread. It is also evident that the 3rd and 8th jurors had virtually decided the defendant’s guilt without any reference to evidence and were both very unwilling to concede that a reasonable doubt existed. It is clear that Rose has used the most unreasonable and reckless jurors to characterise McCarthyism in order to condemn its practise and to explore the dangers that similar movements pose to society. Twelve Angry Men as an interpretation of the American Dream Twelve Angry Men explores a national ethos of the United States; the notion that the opportunity for prosperity and success exists for every man regardless of social class or circumstances of birth. This set of ideals is defined as the ‘American Dream’. Rose has used the jurors of the play to demonstrate how the notion of the American Dream can influence the underpinning ideals that society operates upon. For instance, the 8th juror provides an advocate for the principle of equality – the notion that ‘all men are created equal’ regardless of ethnicity or class. This is demonstrated by his sympathy towards the defendant in regards to his difficult upbringing. The 5th juror then provides an example for the American Dream in action. He has been able to create a successful career for himself despite being born in a slum. Rose has used him to support the premise that social mobility can be achieved despite a disadvantaged upbringing through a willingness to work hard. The 10th juror is then used to represent those who attempt to undermine the values of equality that are explicitly rendered within the dream by continually distinguishing himself from ‘them’. The 3rd juror also exemplifies someone who has achieved material success (not necessarily internal fulfilment) through a willingness to work hard and strive forwards. The consumerist culture that has been facilitated by the American Dream has also been represented by Rose – in the form of the 12th juror. Attached to the 3rd and 12th jurors is the notion that the focus of the dream has shifted to material ownership rather than personal progress or contentment, that success is only defined in terms of money. It is the evident unhappiness of the 3rd juror which details that material possession certainly does not guarantee intrinsic fulfilment. The methodical criticism of seemingly solid facts by the 8th juror highlights a transition from concrete to intangible. Rose has done this to demonstrate that not everything is as certain as it first seemed and in turn this can be applied to the seemingly impermeable institution of the American Dream. The overriding prejudices of many in the jury room shows that hard work may not guarantee success and social class or race can have an impact on individuals perceptions of others. This exemplifies the pessimistic belief that the American wealth structure perpetuates long-standing racial and class inequalities embedded in American society. This is in contrast to the idealistic view that a 1950’s America presented a frontier for egalitarian societies. Thus Rose has debased the belief that obtaining wealth is necessary in achieving one’s dreams. How to cite Rose’s Characterization of McCarthyism, Papers